中国循证儿科杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (3): 177-181.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国新生儿重症监护病房中实施家长参与早产儿住院期间综合管理与常规护理的平行对照研究

向希盈,李颖,李卓颖,谭彦娟,何利,黑明燕   

  1. 中南大学湘雅三医院儿科新生儿亚专科 长沙,410013
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-06 修回日期:2016-06-25 出版日期:2016-06-25 发布日期:2016-06-25
  • 通讯作者: 黑明燕

Feasibility study of family-integrated-care in neonatal intensive care units in China: a parallel controlled trial

XIANG Xi-ying, LI Ying, LI Zhuo-ying, TAN Yan-juan, HE Li, HEI Ming-yan   

  1. Neonatal Division, Department of Pediatrics, the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410013, China
  • Received:2016-06-06 Revised:2016-06-25 Online:2016-06-25 Published:2016-06-25
  • Contact: HEI Ming-yan

摘要:

目的探讨在中国NICU实施家长参与早产儿住院期间综合管理(FICare)的可行性。方法以平行对照设计试验方案,对在中南大学湘雅三医院NICU中符合FICare组纳入标准的早产儿行FICare模式干预(建立FICare组医护团队,NICU改造,掌握六步洗手法、脐带护理、口腔护理、留置胃管管饲、婴儿洗澡、袋鼠式搂抱、称体重、皮肤护理、母乳喂养等),选择同期NICU中符合对照组纳入标准的早产儿以常规护理模式干预。主要观察住院时间,次要观察体重增长速度、开始胃肠内喂养时间和达到全胃肠内喂养的时间、母乳喂养率、院内感染率、总氧疗时间、出院30 d内再次入院率和纠正胎龄37周时NBNA评分;附加观察FICare组家长出现在NICU后FICare医护团队工作期间心理压力、医疗费用、研究期间的医疗纠纷投诉率、病房额外开支、实施FICare后与前1年同期NICU的不良事件数量等。结果FICare组和对照组分别纳入30和60例,两组基线具可比性。FICare组和对照组NICU住院时间分别为(25.9±7.1)d和(29.2±6.0)d,差异有统计学意义(P=0.035)。两组开始胃肠内喂养日龄、院内感染率差异无统计学意义;FICare组与对照组比较,达全胃肠内喂养时间较快、母乳喂养率较高、体重增长速度较快、总的氧疗时间较短、出院30 d内再次入院率较低、纠正胎龄37周时NBNA评分较高,差异均有统计学意义。当FICare组家长出现在NICU,6/6名护士均在工作期间感觉心理压力增加),护士自愿报名参加FICare课题组却增加了7人,没有医疗纠纷投诉, 总医疗费用减少,实施FICare后与前1年同期相比NICU的不良事件数量下降(每月2.2 vs 4次)。结论在中国NICU实施FICare具可行性,继续开展FICare的后续研究是安全的,但医护人员工作压力和NICU的额外支出有所增加。

Abstract:

ObjectiveTo explore the feasibility of the family-integrated-care (FICare) to preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care units (NICU) in China.MethodsThis was a parallel controlled clinical trial. Preterm infants who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were cared either by FICare intervention (establishing FICare team, NICU ward rearrangement and renovation, mothers of infants were trained to do hand hygiene, skin care, oral cavity care, tube feeding, bathing for infants, kangaroo caring, weighing for infants, and breast feeding) or by the current routine no-parent way. The primary outcome was total hospital stay. The secondary outcomes were velocity of daily weight gain, day-of-life (DOL) of starting enteral feeds and full-feeding, rate of breast-feeding, rate of nosocomial infection, total period of oxygenation, medical expenses for hospitalization, re-admission rate with 30 days after discharge, Neonatal Behavior & Neurological Assessment (NBNA) score at corrected 37 weeks of gestation. Other outcomes were number of parent compliant, stressfulness grading of medical staff during working hours, and monthly number of NICU incident report, and extra expenses of the department for FICare.ResultsTo establish FICare team and to have NICU ward renovation for FICare caused extra billing to the department. Total hospital stay of FICare and control groups was (25.9±7.1) d and (29.2±6.0) d, respectively (P=0.035). There was no significant difference between two groups in DOL of starting enteral feeds and rate of nosocomial infection. Compared to control group, DOL of full-feeding of FICare group was faster, rate of breast-feeding was higher, velocity of daily weight gain was faster, total period of oxygenation was shorter, medical expenses for hospitalization was less, re-admission rate with 30 days after discharge was lower, and NBNA score at corrected 37 weeks of gestation was higher with significant difference. During the presence of FICare parents in the NICU ward, the stressfulness grading of nurses during working hours was reported to increase (6/6). But the number of volunteer nurses to join FICare increased by 7, and there was no medical complaint related to FICare. The number of NICU incident report decreased from 4 issues/month the same time in the previous year to 2.2 issues/month after FICare intervention.ConclusionIt is feasible to have FICare for preterm infants in the NICUs in China. It is safe to carry on the FICare study, but working stressfulness of medical staff and extra expenses of department will increase by implementing FICare.